My Community

SKATEBOARDING => CEMENT PARKS => Topic started by: bailgun on October 30, 2007, 07:21:15 PM



Title: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: bailgun on October 30, 2007, 07:21:15 PM


(http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k209/woodshopart/other/tigardguidelines.jpg)

pay extra attention to #3 on the rules...
"by entering and remaining in the skatepark, you voluntarily give consent to have any backpack, bag, or other container searched by tigard police."

rule three of the tigard skatepark apparently supercedes amendment four of the constitution.

this is a big deal. if this goes unopposed, it could easily start a trend of police state skateparks everywhere.

the dudes at skate and annoy are trying to raise a stink about this. go kick in a couple bucks to make some stickers. here's a couple links...

http://skateandannoy.com/?p=4237

http://skateandannoy.com/?p=4135

http://earthpatrolmedia.com/wordpress/?p=867

blow this up. post bulletins on myspace, start threads on any other messageboards you might post on, write some letters, do whatever you can to draw attention to this story... if this gets swept under the rug, it will be one more nail in the constitutions coffin.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Andato on October 30, 2007, 10:24:34 PM
thats fucking stupid


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Schmitty on October 31, 2007, 04:50:50 PM
I got some photos of the park Hammeke sent in, Ill try and get em up tomorrow...


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: bailgun on October 31, 2007, 06:03:34 PM
i wonder if he got any shots of the gestapo rolling in on a backpack sweep.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Andato on November 01, 2007, 11:01:33 PM
sue some bitches!


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: The brycickle on November 01, 2007, 11:44:41 PM
HAMMKNUCKLE!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: bailgun on November 12, 2007, 03:48:05 PM
rule 3 has been removed from the sign.
the interwebs are powerful.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: ze RJM on November 13, 2007, 11:20:34 AM
all hail interwebs!


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: a2zBoardShop on January 04, 2008, 02:18:55 PM
This thread rules, just wanted to share that. Interweb, keep up the good work...


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: turkeylurkey on February 15, 2008, 12:23:37 PM
rule 3 has been removed from the sign.
the interwebs are powerful.
Really? Nice job to all involved!


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: bailgun on February 15, 2008, 02:32:46 PM
yep. lots of emails, phone calls, and liberal use of the phrase "ACLU" can do wonders.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: turkeylurkey on February 15, 2008, 02:45:35 PM
The only thing I like better than the ACLU is the way assholes like Bill O'Reilly hate them. I'm a card carrying member.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: bailgun on February 15, 2008, 03:40:29 PM
bill o'reily is actually an alien robot, sent to teach humanity about irony.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: jesi on August 17, 2009, 01:12:45 AM
Munn v. Illinois (1876) - Ruling that private property may be regulated by the government as long as it is in the interest of the public, the Court upheld a state law which regulated grain elevators.
Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897) - The Court held that economic legislation was, at its core, in lation of the due process clause, a key constituent of the Fourteenth Amendment.  A unanimous Court invalidated a state law regulating insurance contracts with businesses not licensed in the state of Louisiana.
Lochner v. New York (1905) - A state law which forbid employment by a bakery for more than 60 hours a week or 10 hours a dayunreal flash (http://www.y3.com/search-results/23669/unreal-flash-2008) was ruled unconstitutional by the "life, liberty, and property" clause.
Nebbia v. New York (1934) - In upholding state legislation that established a Milk Control Board to set a minimum retail price, the Court ruled that a state may adapt any reasonable economic policy which promotes public welfare, and enforce such a policy through justified legislation.

United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938) - The Court validated a federal statute as constitutional which prohibitedREAL ESTATE MILLIONAIRE NOW (http://www.realestatemillionairenow.com) interstate transfer of "filled milk," a product which resembled milk but was primarily fat or oil.  See Footnote Four.

 


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: tHe pEsSiMisTic on August 17, 2009, 01:17:41 AM
well this is rad..


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Hefeweizen on August 17, 2009, 02:22:55 PM
I wonder what else we can do for skateboarding with the internet. Ideas?


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: bailgun on August 17, 2009, 02:25:28 PM
we could kill it.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: ze RJM on August 17, 2009, 03:02:43 PM
we could kill it.

you mean, like kill zombie skateboarding?


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: C H U C K on August 17, 2009, 03:58:48 PM
we could kill it.

It's already dead. And this is why....

it was bad enough companies like nike, red bull, monster and mountain dew had to throw their greedy little hats in the skateboard/sponsorship world, but now here comes Gatorade with their fucking commercials depicting Chaz Ortiz being mesmerized by Muhammad Ali or their ad of him sweating "tropical splash" after grinding a rail and more recently their newest "athlete" Sean Malto with a nollie heel (i think) down a double set (again, i think, it went kinda fast) being shown in a commercial montage that included the likes of Dwayne Wade and........... ughhh......... beach volleyball, what i want to know is when is it going to be enough? We put up with Dyrdek and Sheckler on MTV (and now J-Rog on TMZ), pre-supra TK with his ice creams and jewelry, and not to mention the fucking Dew Tour, but when do we start calling people out for their suspect if not completely bullshit sponsors?
 
What has this sport become? Every secon.d person you see riding a skateboard is wearing converse shoes and an adidas hat. If you/r a wear adidas, play soccer. Dont ruin skateboarding. And get this shit off of tv, the closest it belongs to the mediia is in a magazine. Now, im fifteen been skateboarding for just about 3 years now, still cant do shit though. so what do skaters need to do to fix our image? nothing about ryan sheckler either, im tired of seeing his name.


RIP my lil' wooden buddy.  :-[ :-[


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: pawnzito on August 18, 2009, 09:53:18 AM
we could kill it.

It's already dead. And this is why....

it was bad enough companies like nike, red bull, monster and mountain dew had to throw their greedy little hats in the skateboard/sponsorship world, but now here comes Gatorade with their fucking commercials depicting Chaz Ortiz being mesmerized by Muhammad Ali or their ad of him sweating "tropical splash" after grinding a rail and more recently their newest "athlete" Sean Malto with a nollie heel (i think) down a double set (again, i think, it went kinda fast) being shown in a commercial montage that included the likes of Dwayne Wade and........... ughhh......... beach volleyball, what i want to know is when is it going to be enough? We put up with Dyrdek and Sheckler on MTV (and now J-Rog on TMZ), pre-supra TK with his ice creams and jewelry, and not to mention the fucking Dew Tour, but when do we start calling people out for their suspect if not completely bullshit sponsors?
 
What has this sport become? Every secon.d person you see riding a skateboard is wearing converse shoes and an adidas hat. If you/r a wear adidas, play soccer. Dont ruin skateboarding. And get this shit off of tv, the closest it belongs to the mediia is in a magazine. Now, im fifteen been skateboarding for just about 3 years now, still cant do shit though. so what do skaters need to do to fix our image? nothing about ryan sheckler either, im tired of seeing his name.


RIP my lil' wooden buddy.  :-[ :-[


Why do you care? Just skate.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: the WORMER on August 18, 2009, 10:23:55 AM
FAIL


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Johnny Copp on August 18, 2009, 01:34:38 PM
Local laws can be unconstitutional and sit on the books for years.  Its's great that someone caught that ish though b/c someone would have had to have gone to jail and then take the appeal process at least to the State Supreme Court.    Essentially the city could even have it written into their own law books..not just skatepark rules....and the cops could act accordingly.   Getting rid of it saved the public a lot of money in court and lawyer fees.    All so "the general public could feel safer"  by putting kids smoking bowls at the park in jail.     This country is so fucked.

Cusack is down for skating and is obviously anti big corporate sponsorship for skating.     I have those moments but I simply turn the other cheek.    I love skateboarding but to me there is way worse that could happen than companies like Nike and Adidas "getting involved".    They both have made amazing skate shoes before they even realized it.    Both shoes companies have been in skating since the seventies.    The first ever THRASHER...the dude in the drawing is skating NIKE!   I grew up watching Daewon, Chico, Brian Lotti, Marc Johnson all rocking Gazelles or Campus Adidas and well if you've skated in some....they fucking rule.    Nike and Adidas also sponsor A SHIT LOAD of people.   I know a kid who recently quit NIKE but just because he was getting shoes from them he was able to eat, skate, and live job free off all the money he made selling his "extra" dunks and the like.    That's NOT what most sponsors are able to do for someone.     So really I don't think they are so evil.    Just my opinion.

Seeing some Chaz Ortiz commercial where he's sweating orange while SKATING is still 20 times better than a UFC banner ad running across the top page of Thrasher.   UFC does't make a sick shoe, sponsor any skater......or even make a good drink with electrolytes????    To me that's just insane.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: ze RJM on August 18, 2009, 01:39:01 PM
That post Chuck put up was a rant from some "15 y.o. core kid who had been skating for 3 years and still sucked"


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: C H U C K on August 18, 2009, 01:48:44 PM
Yeah, I went back a few months and dug up some old posts from when we were getting bombed with all of these 15 year old hardcore "purists."

Me personally, I could care less what anyone drinks, or the shoes on their feet.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: seedless on August 18, 2009, 07:56:01 PM
I thought I read that same thing before. When I read it I laughed, someone that hasnt even been skating for a decade thinks they know whats wrong with skateboarding.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Johnny Copp on August 19, 2009, 08:06:49 AM
Sorry Chuck...didn't know that you were quoting someone.   


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: C H U C K on August 19, 2009, 10:31:28 AM
No problem dude. I was just having some fun at the expense of some groms.


Title: Re: tigard oregon revokes fourth amendment rights.
Post by: Jordan Zuppke on June 13, 2014, 07:09:00 AM
That's really lame, but it's not unconstitutional. If you ever need a skateboarding lawyer, then I am here for you. http://whatwouldalawyerdo.com/skateboard-lawyer/ (http://whatwouldalawyerdo.com/skateboard-lawyer/)